![]() I promise to stop, but here's just one more fucktard from Yahoo groups who wrote: There are so a bunch more stupid fuckers to be fleeced. He probably feels he got out of the business prematurely. That, dipshit, is because they used the digital master from George Martin's 1987 remix. They did not use the same master that Mobile Fidelity Soundlab used in 1982.Īssuming you downloaded - erm, purchased - the version from the stereo box, the answer is simple. I sampled the Beatles box set and first off I would like to say they did a fine job with most of the remastering except for Rubber Soul. Still another fucktard on Yahoo groups wrote: This guy calls himself a fan, yet refers to Ringo's drumming as "a disturbing background noise in certain places" (could those certain places be the second and fourth beats of every bar?). That'd be Ringo using brushes on the snare. All the other tracks do not have this noise As I said it is only in the left speaker, and it is like an old record which collected to much dust. (the song lasts 2.01) from 0.09-0.42 a background noise comes up, again from 0.57 - 1.30 and again from 1.40 - 1.44. It just happened that I was closer to the left speaker than to the right one at a certain moment, and I came to this conclusion: there is a disturbing background noise in certain places. So I came to number 12, "A Taste of Honey". How dare the RIAA deny the Fabs a whole bunch of new gongs? I know that when Garth Brooks brought out his box set it counted as multipleĪnd, has anyone heard any sales figures yet on how many have sold so far? Why is that? If it's a 14 disc boxes why wouldn't it count as 14 units? I just finished reading an article on line that stated each box set countsĪs ONE unit sold, the same as if someone bought one copy of Abbey Road. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |